How Protein, DNA and RNA work
My following article is a baffling conundrum to the evolutionist purpose and directed information exchange orchestrating specific and intended functioning within a cell is continuously conducted within the human genome and the DNA RNA functions that make up the human genome as we probably know the genome is the complete set of genetic material for any given living organism . The human genome is about 3 giga bases long which boils down to 750 MB this is about the same code amount that is found in total of three Mozilla browsers.
……..
The language of DNA is digital but is not binary code like a computer where binary encoding has 0s and 1s to work with, DNA has four positions T,C,G and A.
…..
These letters are used to represent the four informational nucleotide basis of a DNA strand. whereas a digital byte is almost 8 binary digits a DNA byte called a codon has 3 digits because each digit can have 4 values instead of 2 . A DNA codon has 64 possible values compare to a binary byte which has 256 .
..
When we take into account that all 20 plus million species of known life and each of their sub system and sub sub systems are all produced within this 64 valued coding language we can see the amazing efficiency level at which the genome works: of the 20000 to 30000 genes now thought to make up the human genome, most cells actually express only a very small part of the total information code which makes sense, a liver cell for example wud hv no need for the DNA code that makes up neurones.
….
But since almost all the cells carry around a full copy of the genome a system is needed to define out information that is not needed and that is just how DNA works.
Just like a computer program the generic code is full of if and end if statements .
…
This is why stem cells are so hot right now . These cells hv the ability to differentiate into everything the code hasn't been defined out yet so to speak stated more precisely stem cells do not hv everything turned on over the lifetime of the stem cell during which time it may clone of fork many times . It specialises itself ; each specialisation can be regarded as choosing a branch and a tree in which it ll ultimately and finally operate and specialised.
…….
Each stem cell cn make or be induced to make decisions about its future, each decision makes it more specialised. DNA is not simply a Computer programming language but as it is already said there are some starling analogies between DNA and computer code. We can view each cell as a CPU for a central processing unit running it own kernel as we probably know in computing kernel is the main component of most computer operating systems. It's a bridge between applications and the actual data processing done at the hardware level so each cell has a copy of the entire karnal but amazingly each cell chooses to activate only the relevant parts which modules or which driver it loads so to speak if the cell needs to do something or call a function it calls up the right piece of the genome and transcribes it into RNA.
The RNA is then translated into a sequence of amino acids which together make up a protein for which the DNA coded .
……..
Now for the truly amazing part of the equation; this called up and coded protein is then tagged with a shipping address this address is a marker consisting of several several amino acids which tells the rest of the cells where this particular protein needs to be deployed.
………
Once the protein arrives at its intended location the delivery instruction is then stripped off and several post processing steps are performed activating the protein - now do its job, the protein is not activated until at arrives at it marked and intended location.
…
The amazing and complex intelligent communication functions of DNA are myriad . They are too numerous to recount and explain in short but the fact remains , purposed and directed information exchange is continuously conducted within the human genome and the DNA RNA functions that make it up purposed and directed information exchange. You decide is it random dramatically mutated nonpurposed accidental evolution?
=================================================================
Comments :
The evolutionists believe that Genetic mutation are the stuff of life thus the stuff of evolution actually genetic mutations have to be the process of life for evolutionists because without the existence of an intelligent designer there really is no other explanation for help one kind of living organism eventually over millions of years turns into another kind of living organism.
…..
The problem with the genetic mutation argument is that every true form the key words are , “ true form” of genetic mutation discovered shows that mutations result a decrease of useful information or an increase of destructive information to the DNA information science often with horrible results rather than evolutionary results.
…….
No form of true genetic mutation has ever been shown to produce anything usefully additional to a living organism . Mutations have not produced eyes, arms, legs, fins,lungs or reproductive system for example. Doctor E. Meyer professor of zoology at Harvard is famous for the following quote of scientific truth. “To believe that such a drastic mutation would `produce a viable new type, capable of occupying a new adaptive zone, `is equivalent to believing in miracles."—*E. Mayr, "Populations" in Species and Evolution (1970), p. 253.
………
There are two possible sources of the genetic variability which is required and able to drive changes within species ; genetic recombination and mutation.
…….
Mutations are random nucleotide alterations such as copying errors or changes induced by external mutagens and contrast genetic recombination is performed by the cell during the preparation of gametes like sperm, egg or pollen all of which are used for sexual reproduction.
……
Genetic recombination is the primary source of the genetic distinctions between individuals in a living population and must therefore be the principal driving force behind changes within species.
……..
Although genetic recombination was discovered and scientifically proven after the formation of Darwin's theories of evolution it is still playing by evolutionists today that mutations are the sources of any in natural variations within species and evolution takes it even an incomprehensible step further by claiming that ultimately these mutations cause one kind of living organism to become another kind of completely viable and evolve living organism .
….
This is a suppose phenomenon which has never been observed in the totality of man,s existence. In comparison to recombination the changes induced by mutations are totally insignificant.
…..
Mutations are also distrupted to normal gene function and are often corrected by itself whenever detected.
….
Now let's deal with a few of the most recent evolutionary arguments that supposedly prove that evolution occurs through mutation
………
The more that real science investigates these claims the more pseudoscientific evolution appears. The evolutionists will ask what about the mutation of viruses for example the flu virus becoming more more resistant to vaccines?
Bacteria do not become resistant to antibiotics merely by experiencing genetic mutations in fact there are at lest two important genetic mechanisms by which resistance may be conferred.
……..
First there's the process of conjugation during which two bacterial cells join and an exchange of genetic material occurs certain enzymes exchanged in this process coincidentally assist in the breakdown of antibiotics thus making the bacteria resistant to antibiotics .
Secondly bacteria can incorporate into their own genetic machinery foreign pieces of DNA by either of two types of DNA transposition.
……
In transformation DNA from the environment perhaps from the death of another bacterium is absorbed into the bacterial cell and transduction a piece of DNA is transported into the cell by virus for example ; as a result of incorporating new genetic material and organism can become resistant to antibiotics so another words bacteria and viruses adapt rather than purely mutate .
This medical scientific fact is now so well known that many evolutionists have dropped this argument for their proof.
……
Another evolutionist argument is , what about the mosquitoes amazing ability to resist each new repellent used against it?
The source of the mosquitoes ability to resist repellent is found in adaptation ability within its genome; as it adapts it's still a mosquito and no new body parts have been found . This amazing ability is identified as natural selection or adaptation not evolution.
No new species or additional body part are arising from this process and furthermore older pesticides can remain effective especially if a new generation of mosquitoes are not exposed.
…...
What about bacteria developing the ability to digest nylon ?
In the nineteenth seventies a team of Japanese scientists did come across a bacterium that was able to digest nylon yet again it's not exactly the vindication that evolution required.
The mutation that caused the bacterium to do this was not found in the chromosomes, meaning that it could never be transferred during binary fission, also important to note is that plasmids and independent circular self replicating DNA molecule often found in bacteria that carries only few genes, the plasmids in the bacterium have been noted for the ability to adapt to new diets.
his would mean that the bacterium adapted it did not evolve from the mutation.
Every single other examples of evolution is for genetic mutation as the stuff of life falls into the category is just mentioned.
Life cannot exist without proteins . Proteins are essential to every cells function and existence however proteins require DNA to be formed that's because proteins are chains of specifically sequenced amino acids. Amino acids must link up in the precise sequence for a protein to form the precise sequence of a amino acids which is essential to protein formation is it self-determined by precise arrangement of the basis in the DNA molecule .
.........
That means that the precise arrangement of the bases in the DNA molecule constitutes the code for the precise arrangement of amino acids in a chain and the precise amino acids arrangement in a chain is itself necessary for protein formation therefore to put it simply to have life you must-have DNA and protein cannot form without it but DNA by itself is useless , it can't do anything.
.......
DNA does not go anywhere or do anything productive without the already existing proteins that's because in order for DNA to be transcribed and utilized in the cell which is essential to protein formation and life, DNA requires already existing proteins.
...........
DNA also cannot even replicate that is making copies of itself without already existing proteins, it means that if you can get with DNA but without proteins you could never get to proteins or life because DNA needs already existing proteins to even function or form proteins and you couldn't start with protein which is devour of DNA.
.........
Because proteins can only be formed from the instructions and information in DNA that proves that both DNA and proteins not to mention the many other molecular machines that enable them to interact must've been present for the beginning of life one could not have evolved into the other because they require one another for sustenance and utility. They must have been formed simultaneously.
……..
The language of DNA is digital but is not binary code like a computer where binary encoding has 0s and 1s to work with, DNA has four positions T,C,G and A.
…..
These letters are used to represent the four informational nucleotide basis of a DNA strand. whereas a digital byte is almost 8 binary digits a DNA byte called a codon has 3 digits because each digit can have 4 values instead of 2 . A DNA codon has 64 possible values compare to a binary byte which has 256 .
..
When we take into account that all 20 plus million species of known life and each of their sub system and sub sub systems are all produced within this 64 valued coding language we can see the amazing efficiency level at which the genome works: of the 20000 to 30000 genes now thought to make up the human genome, most cells actually express only a very small part of the total information code which makes sense, a liver cell for example wud hv no need for the DNA code that makes up neurones.
….
But since almost all the cells carry around a full copy of the genome a system is needed to define out information that is not needed and that is just how DNA works.
Just like a computer program the generic code is full of if and end if statements .
…
This is why stem cells are so hot right now . These cells hv the ability to differentiate into everything the code hasn't been defined out yet so to speak stated more precisely stem cells do not hv everything turned on over the lifetime of the stem cell during which time it may clone of fork many times . It specialises itself ; each specialisation can be regarded as choosing a branch and a tree in which it ll ultimately and finally operate and specialised.
…….
Each stem cell cn make or be induced to make decisions about its future, each decision makes it more specialised. DNA is not simply a Computer programming language but as it is already said there are some starling analogies between DNA and computer code. We can view each cell as a CPU for a central processing unit running it own kernel as we probably know in computing kernel is the main component of most computer operating systems. It's a bridge between applications and the actual data processing done at the hardware level so each cell has a copy of the entire karnal but amazingly each cell chooses to activate only the relevant parts which modules or which driver it loads so to speak if the cell needs to do something or call a function it calls up the right piece of the genome and transcribes it into RNA.
The RNA is then translated into a sequence of amino acids which together make up a protein for which the DNA coded .
……..
Now for the truly amazing part of the equation; this called up and coded protein is then tagged with a shipping address this address is a marker consisting of several several amino acids which tells the rest of the cells where this particular protein needs to be deployed.
………
Once the protein arrives at its intended location the delivery instruction is then stripped off and several post processing steps are performed activating the protein - now do its job, the protein is not activated until at arrives at it marked and intended location.
…
The amazing and complex intelligent communication functions of DNA are myriad . They are too numerous to recount and explain in short but the fact remains , purposed and directed information exchange is continuously conducted within the human genome and the DNA RNA functions that make it up purposed and directed information exchange. You decide is it random dramatically mutated nonpurposed accidental evolution?
=================================================================
Comments :
The evolutionists believe that Genetic mutation are the stuff of life thus the stuff of evolution actually genetic mutations have to be the process of life for evolutionists because without the existence of an intelligent designer there really is no other explanation for help one kind of living organism eventually over millions of years turns into another kind of living organism.
…..
The problem with the genetic mutation argument is that every true form the key words are , “ true form” of genetic mutation discovered shows that mutations result a decrease of useful information or an increase of destructive information to the DNA information science often with horrible results rather than evolutionary results.
…….
No form of true genetic mutation has ever been shown to produce anything usefully additional to a living organism . Mutations have not produced eyes, arms, legs, fins,lungs or reproductive system for example. Doctor E. Meyer professor of zoology at Harvard is famous for the following quote of scientific truth. “To believe that such a drastic mutation would `produce a viable new type, capable of occupying a new adaptive zone, `is equivalent to believing in miracles."—*E. Mayr, "Populations" in Species and Evolution (1970), p. 253.
………
There are two possible sources of the genetic variability which is required and able to drive changes within species ; genetic recombination and mutation.
…….
Mutations are random nucleotide alterations such as copying errors or changes induced by external mutagens and contrast genetic recombination is performed by the cell during the preparation of gametes like sperm, egg or pollen all of which are used for sexual reproduction.
……
Genetic recombination is the primary source of the genetic distinctions between individuals in a living population and must therefore be the principal driving force behind changes within species.
……..
Although genetic recombination was discovered and scientifically proven after the formation of Darwin's theories of evolution it is still playing by evolutionists today that mutations are the sources of any in natural variations within species and evolution takes it even an incomprehensible step further by claiming that ultimately these mutations cause one kind of living organism to become another kind of completely viable and evolve living organism .
….
This is a suppose phenomenon which has never been observed in the totality of man,s existence. In comparison to recombination the changes induced by mutations are totally insignificant.
…..
Mutations are also distrupted to normal gene function and are often corrected by itself whenever detected.
….
Now let's deal with a few of the most recent evolutionary arguments that supposedly prove that evolution occurs through mutation
………
The more that real science investigates these claims the more pseudoscientific evolution appears. The evolutionists will ask what about the mutation of viruses for example the flu virus becoming more more resistant to vaccines?
Bacteria do not become resistant to antibiotics merely by experiencing genetic mutations in fact there are at lest two important genetic mechanisms by which resistance may be conferred.
……..
First there's the process of conjugation during which two bacterial cells join and an exchange of genetic material occurs certain enzymes exchanged in this process coincidentally assist in the breakdown of antibiotics thus making the bacteria resistant to antibiotics .
Secondly bacteria can incorporate into their own genetic machinery foreign pieces of DNA by either of two types of DNA transposition.
……
In transformation DNA from the environment perhaps from the death of another bacterium is absorbed into the bacterial cell and transduction a piece of DNA is transported into the cell by virus for example ; as a result of incorporating new genetic material and organism can become resistant to antibiotics so another words bacteria and viruses adapt rather than purely mutate .
This medical scientific fact is now so well known that many evolutionists have dropped this argument for their proof.
……
Another evolutionist argument is , what about the mosquitoes amazing ability to resist each new repellent used against it?
The source of the mosquitoes ability to resist repellent is found in adaptation ability within its genome; as it adapts it's still a mosquito and no new body parts have been found . This amazing ability is identified as natural selection or adaptation not evolution.
No new species or additional body part are arising from this process and furthermore older pesticides can remain effective especially if a new generation of mosquitoes are not exposed.
…...
What about bacteria developing the ability to digest nylon ?
In the nineteenth seventies a team of Japanese scientists did come across a bacterium that was able to digest nylon yet again it's not exactly the vindication that evolution required.
The mutation that caused the bacterium to do this was not found in the chromosomes, meaning that it could never be transferred during binary fission, also important to note is that plasmids and independent circular self replicating DNA molecule often found in bacteria that carries only few genes, the plasmids in the bacterium have been noted for the ability to adapt to new diets.
his would mean that the bacterium adapted it did not evolve from the mutation.
Every single other examples of evolution is for genetic mutation as the stuff of life falls into the category is just mentioned.
Life cannot exist without proteins . Proteins are essential to every cells function and existence however proteins require DNA to be formed that's because proteins are chains of specifically sequenced amino acids. Amino acids must link up in the precise sequence for a protein to form the precise sequence of a amino acids which is essential to protein formation is it self-determined by precise arrangement of the basis in the DNA molecule .
.........
That means that the precise arrangement of the bases in the DNA molecule constitutes the code for the precise arrangement of amino acids in a chain and the precise amino acids arrangement in a chain is itself necessary for protein formation therefore to put it simply to have life you must-have DNA and protein cannot form without it but DNA by itself is useless , it can't do anything.
.......
DNA does not go anywhere or do anything productive without the already existing proteins that's because in order for DNA to be transcribed and utilized in the cell which is essential to protein formation and life, DNA requires already existing proteins.
...........
DNA also cannot even replicate that is making copies of itself without already existing proteins, it means that if you can get with DNA but without proteins you could never get to proteins or life because DNA needs already existing proteins to even function or form proteins and you couldn't start with protein which is devour of DNA.
.........
Because proteins can only be formed from the instructions and information in DNA that proves that both DNA and proteins not to mention the many other molecular machines that enable them to interact must've been present for the beginning of life one could not have evolved into the other because they require one another for sustenance and utility. They must have been formed simultaneously.
Comments
Post a Comment